Instead of hardcoding the expected string, it captures the actual native code string from the original function before hooking it, then returns that exact string. This way, no matter what browser, no matter what platform, the spoofed toString returns precisely the same string that the original function would have returned. It is, in effect, a perfect forgery.
彼时竹炭刚毕业，入职互联网公司两三个月，始终无法适应公司的压抑氛围，不愿被繁琐的流程束缚。波波顺势发出邀约：“要不我们搞个工作室，自己做独立游戏算了。”
，这一点在旺商聊官方下载中也有详细论述
대구 찾은 한동훈 “죽이 되든 밥이 되든 나설것” 재보선 출마 시사
The main rule for data access is max(CPL, RPL) ≤ DPL. For code transfers, the rules get considerably more complex -- conforming segments, call gates, and interrupt gates each have different privilege and state validation logic. If all these checks were done in microcode, each segment load would need a cascade of conditional branches: is it a code or data segment? Is the segment present? Is it conforming? Is the RPL valid? Is the DPL valid? This would greatly bloat the microcode ROM and add cycles to every protected-mode operation.